Science and judicial reasoning : the legitimacy of international environmental adjudication

"Science often entails connotations of 'objectivity', 'certainty', and the capability to discover the 'factual truth'. Judicial decisions, in turn, are routinely associated with resolving disputes in a 'final', 'neutral', and 'authoritative...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Sulyok, Katalin, 1986- (Auteur)
Format: Livre
Langue:anglais
Publié: Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2022..
Édition:First paperback edition.
Collection:Cambridge studies on environment, energy and natural resources governance
Sujets:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000008i 4500
001 21558291
003 CL-VaPUC
005 20241004150858.0
008 200609s2022 enk b 001 0 eng
999 |c 444776  |d 444774 
010 |a  2020026290 
020 |a 9781108489669  |q (hardback) 
020 |z 9781108779173  |q (ebook) 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |c Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso  |d DLC 
042 |a pcc 
082 0 0 |a 344.046 SUL 2022  |2 23 
100 1 |a Sulyok, Katalin,  |d 1986-  |e author  |9 891697 
245 1 0 |a Science and judicial reasoning :  |b the legitimacy of international environmental adjudication 
250 |a First paperback edition. 
260 |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ;  |a New York, NY, USA :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2022.. 
300 |a 398 páginas.  
490 0 |a Cambridge studies on environment, energy and natural resources governance 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Introduction to a comparative study on judicial engagement with science. The rules of judicial engagement with science : a three-fold challenge Judicial engagement with science in the environmental case : law of the International Court of Justice Science in the practice of inter-state arbitral tribunals Science in the environmental jurisprudence of regional human rights courts Scientific claims before the WTO Science in the practice of investment arbitral tribunals Science appears before the international tribunal for the Law of the Sea Trends in judicial engagement with science : a comparative assessment Science and the legitimacy of judicial reasoning. 
520 |a "Science often entails connotations of 'objectivity', 'certainty', and the capability to discover the 'factual truth'. Judicial decisions, in turn, are routinely associated with resolving disputes in a 'final', 'neutral', and 'authoritative' way. Yet international environmental adjudication, where scientific and legal authority get entangled with each other, suggests that neither science nor law can fully live up to these idealized expectations. What happens if science and law yield competing narratives as to the factual basis of a dispute? Who could and should resolve their conflict and how, based on what benchmarks? Would the uncertain, probabilistic nature of scientific input diminish the authority of a legal judgment based upon it?"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
583 |c 20240925 
650 0 |a  Derecho ambiental internacional   |x Procesos judiciales  |9 891698 
650 0 |a Ciencia y derecho   |9 891699 
942 |2 ddc  |c BK 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |2 ddc  |4 0  |6 344_046000000000000_SUL_2022  |7 0  |8 A  |9 596951  |a BIBDER  |b BIBDER  |d 2024-09-24  |e 2  |g 69740.50  |i 5662824  |o 344.046 SUL 2022  |p 5662824  |r 2024-09-24  |t 1  |v 69740.50  |w 2024-09-24  |y BK  |k DER