Science and judicial reasoning : the legitimacy of international environmental adjudication
"Science often entails connotations of 'objectivity', 'certainty', and the capability to discover the 'factual truth'. Judicial decisions, in turn, are routinely associated with resolving disputes in a 'final', 'neutral', and 'authoritative...
Saved in:
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Bog |
| Sprog: | engelsk |
| Udgivet: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA :
Cambridge University Press,
2022..
|
| Udgivelse: | First paperback edition. |
| Serier: | Cambridge studies on environment, energy and natural resources governance
|
| Fag: | |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
Indholdsfortegnelse:
- Introduction to a comparative study on judicial engagement with science. The rules of judicial engagement with science : a three-fold challenge Judicial engagement with science in the environmental case : law of the International Court of Justice Science in the practice of inter-state arbitral tribunals Science in the environmental jurisprudence of regional human rights courts Scientific claims before the WTO Science in the practice of investment arbitral tribunals Science appears before the international tribunal for the Law of the Sea Trends in judicial engagement with science : a comparative assessment Science and the legitimacy of judicial reasoning.